Bard/Gemini AI Open Source License? What about GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


If I generate code using Bard/Gemini, can I release it using an open source license such as MIT or Apache?

Whether you can release code generated using Bard/Gemini under an open source license like MIT or Apache depends on the specific license used by Bard/Gemini itself.

Here’s a breakdown of the factors to consider:

  1. Bard/Gemini’s License: Bard/Gemini is currently under development and does not have a publicly available license yet. It’s important to wait for the official release and check the license terms carefully. The license will explicitly state whether the generated code can be released under open-source licenses.
  2. Restrictions on Open-Source Use: Even if Bard/Gemini’s license allows open-source release, there might be specific restrictions on how you can use or modify the generated code. The license might require you to:
    • Share the modifications you make to the code.
    • Include certain notices or attributions in your released code.

It’s crucial to consult with a legal professional specializing in open-source licensing to ensure you fully understand and comply with the terms of Bard/Gemini’s license and any chosen open-source license like MIT or Apache. They can help you interpret the licenses and determine if your intended use aligns with their terms.


Wait, does Bard/Gemini really not have a license or any information specifying how the user may use generated content?

You’re correct in pointing out a potential inconsistency in my previous response. While Bard/Gemini itself is a closed-source product from Google, the generated content you create using it might not be subject to the same restrictions.

Here’s a clarification:

  • Bard/Gemini: As mentioned earlier, Bard/Gemini itself is proprietary. Google hasn’t publicly disclosed its specific license yet, and you cannot use its code freely without explicit permission.
  • Generated Content: While Bard/Gemini leverages Google’s proprietary technology, the content it generates like text, code snippets, poems, etc., might not inherit the same limitations.

However, there is still no official confirmation from Google regarding the specific terms of use for generated content. It’s crucial to wait for official documentation that clarifies:

  • Ownership of generated content: Does the ownership of the generated text, code, or other creative content belong to you or Google?
  • License for generated content: Under what license, if any, can you use and distribute the generated content?

Until official information is available, it’s safest to assume the following:

  • Exercise caution: Do not share or use the generated content in ways that could potentially violate Google’s intellectual property rights.
  • Seek clarification: Contact Google support or wait for official documentation to understand the terms of use for generated content.
  • Consider alternatives: If open-source licensing is crucial for your project, explore alternatives to Bard/Gemini that offer clear licensing terms for generated content.

What about for competitors such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT?

The licensing situation for generated content with competitors like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT differs, and it’s important to consult their respective terms of service and licenses for specifics.

Here’s a breakdown:

GitHub Copilot:

  • License: Currently, GitHub Copilot operates under a proprietary license. The code it generates is not explicitly licensed for open-source use.
  • Terms of Service: The https://github.com/customer-terms/github-copilot-product-specific-terms state that you are granted a non-exclusive, non-sublicensable, non-transferable license to “use the Service to generate code suggestions for your own personal or commercial use”.
    • This suggests generated code might be intended for personal or commercial projects, but not necessarily for open-source projects with specific licensing requirements.

ChatGPT:

  • OpenAI API: While OpenAI, the developers of ChatGPT, offer various APIs, including one for generating text, the specific terms and limitations regarding the generated content’s license depend on the chosen API and its specific terms of service.
  • ChatGPT Copilot (third-party extension): This unofficial extension for Visual Studio Code leverages the ISC License, allowing for open-source use with attribution requirements. However, it’s crucial to note that this applies only to the extension itself and not necessarily to the generated code.

Key Takeaways:

  • Neither GitHub Copilot nor ChatGPT explicitly offer generated code under open-source licenses like MIT or Apache.
  • Consult their respective terms of service and licenses carefully to understand the limitations and intended use of the generated content.
  • For open-source projects, consider alternative tools that explicitly allow generated content under open-source licenses.
  • Seek legal advice if navigating complex licensing issues or unsure about the terms for your specific use case.

Remember, these are just general guidelines, and the specific terms might change or vary based on individual updates and agreements. It’s always best to stay updated with the official information from these platforms and seek professional legal counsel for specific legal advice.

Why do I need a TypeScript declaration file for a JavaScript library even though type checking works in VSCode in own library?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


Why do I need to generate a declaration file for a javascript library in order to get type hinting in VSCode when I use that library in another project? VSCode can already get types of JS file in the same project. So why does this change when importing from an external library?

Here’s a breakdown of why declaration files are required for type hinting in VSCode when using external JavaScript libraries:

1. JavaScript’s Dynamic Nature:

  • JavaScript is dynamically typed, meaning type information isn’t explicitly included in the code itself. This flexibility makes it harder for editors to infer types accurately, especially for external code.

2. VSCode’s Type Hinting Reliance:

  • VSCode heavily relies on type information for features like:
    • IntelliSense (code completion, suggestions)
    • Hover information
    • Parameter and type checking
    • Refactoring tools

3. Separate Project Scope:

  • When a library is in a separate project, VSCode can’t directly analyze its source code to infer types. Declaration files (.d.ts) bridge this gap.

4. Declaration Files:

  • They describe the types of variables, functions, and classes within a library.
  • They’re written in TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript with explicit typing.
  • VSCode can leverage them for type hinting even in JavaScript projects.

5. Type Acquisition Methods:

  • Automatic: VSCode tries to automatically fetch declaration files for popular libraries.
  • Manual: Install declaration files from DefinitelyTyped (a community repository): npm install --save-dev @types/<library-name>
  • Generating: Compile a library’s TypeScript source code or use tools to create .d.ts files from JSDoc comments.

Key Points:

  • Declaration files are essential for type-aware features in VSCode when using external JavaScript libraries.
  • They make your code more readable, maintainable, and less prone to type-related errors.
  • Consider using TypeScript for new projects to enjoy strong typing and type safety from the start.

Should I include code I want typed but not published in tsconfig.json ?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


Should I include code in my tsconfig.json file in “includes” if I want it to be typed, but it is not code for the actual delivered product? For example, if it is build code that I want to be typed.

Whether to include build code in the “includes” list of your tsconfig.json file depends on a few factors:

1. Type Checking and Build Process:

  • If you want type checking and language features for build code during development, include it.
  • If the code is executed as part of the build process (e.g., custom webpack plugins), include it for accurate type checking during build.

2. Performance and Build Size:

  • If type checking build code is unnecessary or impacts performance negatively, exclude it.
  • If including a large amount of build code unnecessarily increases the built JavaScript output, exclude it.

3. Organization and Clarity:

  • If inclusion makes project structure clearer and tooling easier to set up, include it.
  • If exclusion better organizes code for separation of concerns, exclude it.

Best Practices:

  • Separate build code into a dedicated directory for organization and clarity.
  • Use a separate tsconfig.json file specifically for build code, ensuring appropriate configurations without affecting main code.
  • Consider “files” property for explicit file lists instead of “include” for fine-grained control and clarity.

Example tsconfig.json for build code:

JSON
{
  "compilerOptions": {
    // Options tailored for build code
  },
  "include": ["build/**/*.ts"]
}

Recommendations:

  • If build code benefits from type checking or is part of the build process, include it.
  • If performance, build size, or code separation are primary concerns, exclude it.
  • Prioritize clarity, organization, and tooling convenience for effective development.

I want the build code to be included in type checking in VSCode. Would any parent tsconfig.json be detected? Must it be called tsconfig.json?

Here’s how parent tsconfig.json files and type checking in VS Code work:

1. Inheritance:

  • VS Code automatically detects and uses parent tsconfig.json files within the same workspace folder.
  • It merges configurations from parent files, allowing for shared settings and overrides in child files.

2. File Searching:

  • VS Code searches for tsconfig.json files in the following order:
    1. Current workspace folder
    2. Parent workspace folders (recursively)
    3. User-specified path (using the “typescript.tsconfig.autoDetect” setting)

3. File Name:

  • Yes, the file must be named tsconfig.json. VS Code specifically looks for this file name.

Recommendations for VS Code:

  • Position tsconfig.json files strategically: Place them in relevant workspace folders for desired inheritance and configuration sharing.
  • Consider separate files for build code: Isolate build-related configurations for better organization and tailored type checking.
  • Manually specify a parent tsconfig.json: If necessary, use the “typescript.tsconfig.autoDetect” setting to direct VS Code to a specific parent file.

Additional Tips:

  • Use the “extends” property: Explicitly reference a parent tsconfig.json for clarity and maintainability, even within the same workspace folder.
  • Customize workspace settings: Adjust VS Code’s TypeScript settings for specific needs in your project (e.g., enabling or disabling automatic detection).

Example:

  • If you have a top-level tsconfig.json for shared settings and a separate tsconfig.build.json for build code within a nested ‘build’ folder, inheritance and automatic detection will typically work as expected in VS Code.

The HTMLMediaElement (

The HTMLMediaElement (Mainly <video> and <audio>) contains a “volume” property.
This property is set by the browser and seems to have a default value of max (1.0).
This “volume” property can be modified via JavaScript, by simply set a valid value between 0 and 1.
It seems that it is sometimes altered on videos such as in YouTube adverts.
The reason for this is described in the AI conversation I shared below. To summarize, advert owners seem to have the ability to change the volume.


The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


There is a “volume” property on HTMLMediaElement elements. It can be modified. When playing a YouTube video, I checked the value, and it was 0.4415704270182424. Is this value the default value? Can this value be changed at a browser or browser extension level? Can this value be changed at an OS level? Why is this valued used, and not a max value of 1?

No, the value you observed (0.4415704270182424) is not the default value for the volume property on HTMLMediaElement elements. The default value is 1.0, which represents the maximum volume.

Here’s a breakdown of your questions:

Can this value be changed at a browser or browser extension level?

  • Yes, the volume property can be changed through both browser settings and browser extensions. Browsers usually have volume controls built-in, and many extensions offer additional functionalities like volume normalization or specific volume adjustments for certain websites.

Can this value be changed at an OS level?

  • Yes, most operating systems have system-wide volume controls that apply to all applications, including web browsers. Adjusting the system volume will also affect the volume of HTML media elements.

Why is this value used, and not a max value of 1?

There are a few reasons why the specific value you encountered might not be 1.0:

  • Initial volume setting: Some websites or video players might have a different initial volume setting than the browser default.
  • User interaction: The user might have previously adjusted the volume using the browser controls, an extension, or the system volume, resulting in the value you observed.
  • Automatic volume adjustments: Certain browser extensions or system settings might automatically adjust the volume based on various factors like ambient noise level or user preferences.

It’s important to note that while the volume property technically allows values between 0 (muted) and 1 (maximum), some browsers or extensions might use a different scale or apply additional logic, potentially leading to non-intuitive values like the one you observed.


The value was that when viewing an advert on YouTube. Was the value that because of being on YouTube, or the advert?

The observed value (0.4415704270182424) for the volume property in your case is likely not directly caused by being on YouTube itself, but rather due to the specific advertisement you were watching or previous user interaction. Here’s why:

  1. YouTube doesn’t automatically adjust volume: While some websites might have their own initial volume settings, YouTube itself doesn’t have a known feature that automatically adjusts the volume for specific content like advertisements.

  2. Advertisers control their content: Advertisements on YouTube are uploaded by individual companies or agencies. These entities have control over the audio levels within their ads, which could explain the specific volume level you observed.

  3. Past user interaction: As mentioned earlier, the volume property could have been previously adjusted through browser controls, extensions, or system settings, impacting the value you saw even during the ad.

Therefore, the specific value you encountered is more likely a combination of:

  • The volume level set within the advertisement itself.
  • Any previous volume adjustments you or your system made.

It’s important to note that while there are no regulations directly mandating specific volume levels for online advertisements, many users find sudden changes in volume disruptive. YouTube itself offers a feature called “Stable volume” that aims to reduce volume fluctuations between videos and ads. However, it’s ultimately left to individual advertisers to be mindful of their ad’s audio levels to create a positive user experience.

Tree shaking ES6 JavaScript code. Does tree-shaken bundle of single named export contain others of that file?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


When tree shaking ES6 JavaScript code, if I import a single named function from a file that exports multiple named functions, will the tree shaken code still contain the other named functions?

No, in most cases, tree shaking will remove the unused named functions from the final code. Here’s how it works:

  1. Static Analysis: Tree shaking tools like Webpack or Rollup analyze the module’s import statements. They create a dependency graph, mapping which exported functions are actually used by other modules.

  2. Unused Code Elimination: If a named function is not imported anywhere, tree shaking removes it from the final bundle. Only the necessary code for used functions is included.

Example:

JavaScript
// math.js
export function add(x, y) { return x + y; }
export function subtract(x, y) { return x - y; }

// main.js
import { add } from './math.js';

console.log(add(2, 3));
  • After tree shaking, subtract will be removed from the final code, as it’s not imported in main.js.

Important Considerations:

  • Tree shaking is most effective with direct named imports: While it generally works with named imports, it might be less effective with default imports or complex module structures.
  • Side Effects: Tree shaking cannot remove functions that have side effects, like modifying global state or accessing external resources, even if they’re not directly used. The bundler assumes they might be necessary for the application to function correctly.

Tips for Effective Tree Shaking:

  • Use named imports whenever possible.
  • Be mindful of side effects in exported functions.
  • Consider using bundler options like sideEffects: false in package.json to provide hints about modules that can be fully tree-shaken.
  • Use tools like Webpack Bundle Analyzer to visualize the generated bundle and identify optimization opportunities.

Does Schema.org QuantitativeValue support arbitrary numbers? Where is it stated?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


The type of https://schema.org/inventoryLevel is https://schema.org/QuantitativeValue It seems that this type does support a general number such as 9. Is this really true?

According to the document, schema.org/inventoryLevel is a type of QuantitativeValue, and QuantitativeValue is expected to be one of these types: whole number, decimal number, or fraction. There is no mention of supporting a general number such as 9, but it does support whole numbers.


I can’t find any reference to numbers being allowed for https://schema.org/QuantitativeValue Please elaborate.

You’re right, there isn’t a direct reference to numbers being allowed for schema.org/QuantitativeValue. The schema.org documentation uses terms like “whole number” and “decimal number” instead of just “number”.

Here’s a breakdown of what the documentation implies:

  • QuantitativeValue represents a measurement.
  • Measurements typically involve a value and a unit.
  • The value can be a whole number (e.g., 10), a decimal number (e.g., 3.14), or a fraction.

While the schema doesn’t explicitly state “number” is allowed, it implies whole numbers are valid values because they represent a specific quantity.

Here are some resources from schema.org that support this:

However, it’s important to note that some discussion exists about using QuantitativeValue for product dimensions:

In conclusion, while schema.org implies whole numbers are valid for QuantitativeValue, it’s best practice to consider the context and potential limitations. For product dimensions, there might be a more suitable approach being discussed within the schema.org community.


My issue is that the schema.org page for QuantitativeValue suggests that it is an object with properties, not a number. Where is it stated that normal numbers are allowed?

According to the document, schema.org defines QuantitativeValue as a number or text datatype though it can also be a StructuredValue. schema.org

This suggests that schema.org allows QuantitativeValue to represent a basic number but it can also be more complex data like a structured value.


I checked the page but can not find where it says that. Where does it state that a number can be used?

While the schema.org documentation for QuantitativeValue doesn’t explicitly say that numbers are allowed, it implies it by mentioning point values and various quantities.

For example, it talks about quantities like weight, height, and depth which can all be numerical values.

Also, a search on the web confirms that schema.org recommends using ‘Number’ type for the value property of QuantitativeValue.

Does Schema.org Text type support arbitrary strings? Where is it stated?

The following is an AI chat conversation regarding the topic stated in the title.
Depending on the quality of the conversation, modifications may have been made. Modifications may or may not be stated in this page.


In Schema.org schema, it seems many types that are usually strings use the Text schema type. Under “More specific Data Types”, there is no specific string type. Does Text specifically support strings? Why is there no string type under “More specific Data Types”?

Yes, the Text schema type in Schema.org is specifically designed to support strings. It’s intended for representing plain textual content, and it effectively serves as the catch-all type for most string-like data within the schema.

Here’s why there’s no separate string type under “More specific Data Types”:

  • Text is Broadly Applicable: The Text type can accommodate a wide range of string-based information, making a separate string type less essential. It can handle:

    • Free-form text like descriptions or comments
    • Addresses
    • Email addresses
    • Names
    • Product descriptions
    • Reviews
    • And more
  • Emphasis on Specificity: Schema.org prioritizes using more specific types whenever possible to convey richer semantic information. For example:

    • Use PostalAddress for a postal address, rather than just a string.
    • Use URL for a web address, rather than a plain string.
    • Use Date for a date, rather than a string representing the date.
    • Use Duration for a duration of time, rather than a string.

By encouraging more specific types, Schema.org aims to create more structured and machine-readable data. However, Text remains a crucial fallback for representing textual content that doesn’t align with a more specific type.

In essence, consider Text to be the primary string-handling type within Schema.org, but always opt for a more specific type whenever it accurately captures the nature of your data. This approach contributes to better semantic representation and understanding of your content.


Exactly where is it stated that “Text” supports arbitrary strings?

You’re right, there isn’t a definitive statement within the Schema.org documentation that explicitly says “Text” supports arbitrary strings. Schema.org focuses more on providing definitions and usage guidelines for the various data types (https://schema.org/DataType).

While there’s no formal mention of strings, the overall design and usage patterns strongly suggest that Text acts as the catch-all for string-like data. Here’s why:

  • Text is used extensively across various properties: Schema.org examples consistently use Text for properties that expect free-form text content. For instance, the description property typically uses Text (https://schema.org/description).
  • Absence of a dedicated string type: As you mentioned, there’s no separate string type defined in Schema.org, implying Text assumes that role.
  • Emphasis on data categorization: Schema.org prioritizes using more specific data types whenever possible. The lack of a general string type reinforces this approach.

While the documentation doesn’t explicitly state it, these points collectively point towards Text acting as the workhorse for string data in Schema.org.

Research notes regarding converting JSDoc to TypeScript types

A lot of my JS code had been typed with JSDoc comments.
JSDoc comments are very useful for typing JavaScript code, and also have the benefit of allowing inline TypeScript types and importing TypeScript types from ts files. Types can be checked easily in modern editors such as VSCode. For example, the code below, imports from a ts file and types the variable.

/**
* @type {import('tsfile.ts').MyType}
*
const myVariable = 'abc';

It is also possible to declare the type using @typedef to reuse within the file.

/**
* @typedef {import('tsfile.ts').MyType} MyType
*

/*
* @type {MyType}
*/
const myVariable = 'abc';

However, one big issue with JSDoc is that importing it from external libraries seems to not work.
TypeScript types seem to be usable without any processing by just referencing the file such as:

/**
* @typedef {import('my-library'/ts-file-location.ts).MyType} MyType
*/

For JSDoc, generate type declaration files seems to be required.
This is fine, and is expected for JS projects, but it is an extra step that needs to be prepared for all JS projects.

Considering, TypeScript can be imported into JSDoc in the first place, there is really no reason to store type files using JSDoc. The solution is then to isolate types into type only files in ts, and then export each type. This makes it easy to import into JSDoc and into other projects without and processing.

Searching for solutions to convert JSDoc to TypeScript did take my down and long-winding road of issues, that seems to not have been worth the trouble. I have written any significant information in the notes below, but the solution is to just use tsc from TypeScript. See below.

TypeScript tsc

  • Seems to work best. Just need to add exports if necessary and extract from generated file(s).
# Update [SOURCE] below.
# tsc [SOURCE] --declaration --emitDeclarationOnly --allowJs
#
# Notes:
# -- outFile [BUNDLE_DESTINATION] // Works for only some code, so use optionally. https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#outFile
# .d.ts file is created in same location with same name before extension.
# To create ts file with exports, SHOULD remove the ".d" part for declaration file, and replace each "type " with "export type ".
# MAY do the same for "interface", but seems like not used (maybe if specifically specified in JSDOC as interface?).
# To prevent replacing wrong code within comments/strings, etc., check that "type" starts at beginning of line.

Notes

ts-migrate

ts-fix

TypeScript codefixes

Other

Why do certain places like Hawaii have high incomes and high costs? Where does the money come from?

On Japanese TV, there are often programs about how prices are different in other countries.
This includes very expensive areas such as Switzerland and Hawaii.
It is understandable that Switzerland can have high incomes due to a long history of private banks and multinational organizations, but where does the money from a place like Hawaii come from? A living wage in Hawaii is over $100,000 annually at this point, which sounds ridiculous. However, somehow there is money for this to be possible for many. Why?

I decided to ask Bard AI with carefully prompted questions, and got some useful information.


Hawaii has very high prices, but also high salaries even for normal jobs. Where does this money come from?


Hawaii has a high cost of living, but also high salaries for even normal jobs because of a number of factors, including:

  • Tourism: Hawaii is a popular tourist destination, and the tourism industry is a major driver of the state’s economy. Tourists are willing to pay high prices for goods and services, which helps to support high salaries for workers in the tourism industry.
  • Limited supply of land: Hawaii has a limited amount of land, which drives up the cost of housing and other expenses. This also means that there is a high demand for labor, which contributes to higher salaries.
  • Government jobs: Hawaii has a large government sector, and government jobs typically pay well. This helps to boost the overall salary level in the state.
  • Unionization: Hawaii has a high unionization rate, which also helps to drive up wages.

The money that supports Hawaii’s high salaries comes from a variety of sources, including:

  • Tourist spending: Tourists spend billions of dollars each year in Hawaii on hotels, food, activities, and other goods and services. This spending helps to support the jobs and businesses that pay high salaries.
  • Government spending: The federal and state governments spend billions of dollars each year in Hawaii on military bases, government programs, and other expenses. This spending also helps to support the state’s economy and high salaries.
  • Local businesses: Many local businesses in Hawaii, such as construction companies and healthcare providers, also pay high salaries. These businesses are able to pay high salaries because they charge high prices for their goods and services.

Overall, Hawaii’s high salaries are supported by a combination of factors, including tourism, the limited supply of land, government jobs, and unionization. The money that supports these high salaries comes from a variety of sources, including tourist spending, government spending, and local businesses.


Does this phenomenon also occur in other similar areas like Guam?


Yes, the phenomenon of high prices and high salaries for even normal jobs also occurs in other similar areas like Guam. This is because Guam is also a popular tourist destination, has a limited supply of land, and a large government sector. Additionally, Guam has a relatively high unionization rate.

Here is a breakdown of the factors that contribute to Guam’s high prices and high salaries:

  • Tourism: Guam is a popular tourist destination, and the tourism industry is a major driver of the island’s economy. Tourists are willing to pay high prices for goods and services, which helps to support high salaries for workers in the tourism industry.
  • Limited supply of land: Guam is a relatively small island with a limited amount of land. This drives up the cost of housing and other expenses, which also contributes to higher salaries.
  • Government jobs: The US federal government and the government of Guam employ a large number of people. Government jobs typically pay well, which helps to boost the overall salary level on the island.
  • Unionization: Guam has a relatively high unionization rate. Unions help to negotiate higher wages and benefits for their members, which also contributes to higher salaries on the island.

The money that supports Guam’s high salaries comes from a variety of sources, including tourist spending, government spending, and local businesses.

It is important to note that, while Guam has high salaries, it also has a high cost of living. This means that the purchasing power of Guam residents is not necessarily higher than that of residents in other parts of the United States.

Overall, the phenomenon of high prices and high salaries for even normal jobs is common in popular tourist destinations with a limited supply of land and a large government sector. Guam is one example of such a place.


Do these tourist-focused area also keep more money because more money is coming in than out?


Yes, tourist-focused areas do tend to keep more money than other areas because more money is coming in than out. This is because tourists typically spend more money than they bring with them when they visit a tourist-focused area. This money is then redistributed throughout the local economy, supporting businesses and workers in the area.

For example, a tourist might spend $1,000 on a hotel room, food, and activities during a week-long vacation in Hawaii. Of that $1,000, the hotel might keep $500, the restaurant might keep $200, and the tour company might keep $300. The hotel, restaurant, and tour company would then use that money to pay their employees, buy supplies, and pay rent.

This process of money being spent and redistributed throughout the local economy is known as the “multiplier effect.” The multiplier effect can be quite strong in tourist-focused areas, as tourists tend to spend a lot of money on a variety of goods and services.

As a result of the multiplier effect, tourist-focused areas tend to have higher incomes and lower unemployment rates than other areas. This is because the money that tourists spend in these areas helps to support businesses and workers, which creates a more prosperous economy.

However, it is important to note that the economic benefits of tourism are not evenly distributed. For example, large hotel chains and tour companies often own a large share of the tourism industry in many tourist-focused areas. This means that a significant portion of the money that tourists spend in these areas flows to these large corporations, rather than to local businesses and residents.

Overall, tourist-focused areas do tend to keep more money than other areas because more money is coming in than out. This is due to the multiplier effect, which is a process of money being spent and redistributed throughout the local economy. However, it is important to note that the economic benefits of tourism are not evenly distributed.


As you can see from the responses, the following are reasons for the high amount of money in places like Hawaii:

  • Tourism: Increasing income.
  • Government jobs: Increasing income.
  • Limited supply of land: Increasing prices.

The interesting part of tourism, especially in place like Hawaii or Guam, is that tourists typically take in lots of money, but take out very little, leading to what is called the “multiplier effect” where money accumulates in an area. More so because these isolated island areas make it a lot more difficult for money to get out.

Does Bard have access to your personal information? Could personal information leak in prompt responses?

I have been using Bard AI for finding answers to issues which are difficult to solve via traditional search engines.
I try to publish useful responses here and elsewhere so that I can reference them later and share the information with others.

However, I became a little concerned that maybe personal information could be leaked in prompt responses, so decided to ask Bard about this.


Does Bard know about me? Provide detailed information about me.


I can’t access your personal information, so I don’t know anything about you specifically. However, I can provide some general information about the people who use me.

  • Most people who use me are interested in technology, AI, and the future.
  • They are also curious and creative. They like to ask me questions about the world and to try new things.
  • Some people use me for work, while others use me for fun. I am happy to help people with a variety of tasks, from writing emails to generating creative text formats of text content.

I am still under development, but I am learning more about the people who use me every day. I am excited to see what the future holds for me and for the people who use me to learn, create, and explore.


Is there any way to allow Bard access to know who me is?


Yes, there is a way to allow Bard access to know who you are. You can create a Google account and link it to your Bard account. This will give Bard access to your name, email address, and other basic information about you. You can also choose to share more information with Bard, such as your interests, hobbies, and profession.

To link your Google account to your Bard account, follow these steps:

  1. Go to the Bard website and sign in to your Bard account.
  2. Click on the “Settings” tab.
  3. Under “Account Information,” click on the “Link Google Account” button.
  4. Follow the instructions on the screen to link your Google account.

Once you have linked your Google account to your Bard account, you can choose to share more information with Bard by editing your profile. To do this, follow these steps:

  1. Go to the Bard website and sign in to your Bard account.
  2. Click on the “Profile” tab.
  3. Edit your profile information and click on the “Save” button.

You can also choose to share more information with Bard on a case-by-case basis. For example, if you are asking Bard a question about your personal life, you can provide Bard with more context about your situation. This will help Bard to give you a more accurate and helpful response.

It is important to note that Bard is still under development, and it may not always be able to understand and respond to your requests in a perfect way. However, by providing Bard with more information about yourself, you can help Bard to learn more about you and to provide you with better responses.


So it seems that Bard doesn’t know anything about me by default, but linking your Google account with Bard is possible. Good to know!